01 · In development
Human Experience
An ongoing, consent-based interview system that reconstructs a person’s life history — childhood, relationships, adversity, work, changing beliefs — and their own interpretations of it.
Partners · Licensing and research
We’re developing ways to give AI systems experiential foundations — and the evaluations to show whether they help. We’re looking for a small number of design partners to shape that work before anything is sold.
What we’re developing
01 · In development
An ongoing, consent-based interview system that reconstructs a person’s life history — childhood, relationships, adversity, work, changing beliefs — and their own interpretations of it.
02 · In development
Coherent, explicitly synthetic life histories for research, simulation and agent applications — representing diverse circumstances without claiming anyone lived them.
03 · In development
Portable Life Packages and runtime adapters, so agents can retrieve relevant experiences, weigh inferred lessons and revise beliefs. BEDROCK separates recollection, interpretation, hypothesis and confidence.
Who it’s for
Persistent agents whose behaviour should be grounded, explainable and differentiated.
Exploring how experience might inform behaviour — always inside operational safety constraints.
Where a diversity of plausible histories may itself be the value.
Systems people return to over months and years.
Before you ask
We don’t know yet, and we won’t claim it does until we can show it. The first gate is evidence that experiential grounding produces measurable benefits beyond richer prompting.
The first evaluations will measure behavioural differentiation, decision quality, stability across repeated trials, sensitivity to irrelevant memories, calibration, and consistency with the claimed provenance. Until results exist, every demonstration on this site is labelled illustrative.
Different decisions are not necessarily better decisions. In some simulation products, useful diversity may be the point. In safety-critical robotics, uncontrolled variation is a liability.
Our rule: experiential identity must never override operational safety constraints. It can change how an agent explains itself — never whether it complies.
Two sources, never confused: adults who voluntarily take part in structured interviews under explicit privacy and licensing terms, and explicitly synthetic histories constructed by our team. Every package carries its provenance.
No. A memory is evidence of a recollection; its meaning is a hypothesis. BEDROCK keeps what a person recalled apart from what we infer, and records confidence with its reasons. Memory verification, psychological interpretation and behavioural usefulness are separate questions.
As contributors, not products. Participation fees and/or royalties are being considered, subject to agreement. Consent is recorded before any session, and recollections are presented only as recollections.
Nothing yet. We’re in foundation research. The stages ahead — behavioural validation, private pilots, commercial licensing, embodied intelligence — are intended stages, not commitments to dates. Design partners help decide what gets built first.
Design-partner program
Tell us what you’re building. We’ll reply personally — this goes to a person, not a sales sequence.
The inquiry form opens soon.
Until then, write to us directly and a person will reply.
Synthetic — constructed
A constructed life history. No person lived these events. It is built by our research team from a written design brief, for a stated research purpose, and reviewed before use.
All labels explainedContributed — as recalled
Recounted by a consenting participant in a guided interview. A recollection, not a verified record. Shown only with permission, with identifying details changed.
All labels explainedIllustrative — not real data
Written by our team to show the format. No interview took place and no model was run. No result is implied.
All labels explainedSimulated — model runs
Produced by running a model, with the number of runs, the date and the model stated alongside. Not yet an evaluated result.
All labels explainedMeasured — see report
A result from a controlled evaluation. Always shown with a link to the dated evaluation report it comes from.
All labels explainedReported — in their words
What a person recalled, or how they themselves interpret it. Evidence of a recollection — not a verified record of what happened.
All labels explainedInterpretation — inferred by BEDROCK
A belief the platform infers from several reported experiences. Always a hypothesis, with its evidence, the agreement between sources, and a confidence level.
All labels explainedHypothesis — a proposed causal link
A suggested connection between experiences and beliefs. Recorded so it can be tested, revised or discarded as new evidence arrives.
All labels explainedRender — computer-generated
A computer-generated image made for this site. It does not depict a real product, factory, robot or person.
All labels explained